<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Devoxx 2009 &#8211; day 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.whitehorses.nl/2009/11/18/devoxx-2009-day-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.whitehorses.nl/2009/11/18/devoxx-2009-day-2/</link>
	<description>Oracle, Java and SOA expertise - Lean thinking, Agile working</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis MP</title>
		<link>http://blog.whitehorses.nl/2009/11/18/devoxx-2009-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis MP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.whitehorses.nl/?p=510#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&quot;I also think the Glassfish should not have included this feature, especially since it is the reference implementation.&quot;

GlassFish is a *production-quality* reference implementation. People do expect it to go beyond what the spec requires. Also, Ludo&#039;s demo showed how calling an OSGi declarative service was done using only a Java EE standard annotation: @Resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also think the Glassfish should not have included this feature, especially since it is the reference implementation.&#8221;</p>
<p>GlassFish is a *production-quality* reference implementation. People do expect it to go beyond what the spec requires. Also, Ludo&#8217;s demo showed how calling an OSGi declarative service was done using only a Java EE standard annotation: @Resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

